PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 1575 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Muhammad Qaseem vs Abdul Hameed Ss — 2024 PCrLJ 1575 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2024 PCrLJ 1575 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 1575 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Muhammad Qaseem vs Abdul Hameed Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 26---C; S. 403---C; S. 403; S. 26; General Clauses Act (X of 1897); Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898); General Clauses Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 1575 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Muhammad Qaseem VS Abdul Hameed Ss. 3, 4 & 5---General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 26---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 403---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 13(a)---Illegal dispossession---Double jeopardy, principle of---Applicability---Accused persons were aggrieved of charge framed by Trial Court on complaint filed by respondent / complainant---Plea raised by accused persons was that principle of double jeopardy was applicable---Validity---Provision of Art. 13 (a) of the Constitution, S.403 of Cr.P.C. and S.26 of General Clauses Act, 1897, were not attracted as rule of dual jeopardy could only be applied in the case of same occurrence in between same parties---In the present case there were two occurrence which were different having interval of more than two decades---High Court declined to interfere in order passed by Trial Court---Revision was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English