PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 1660 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Muhammad Anees vs State S — 2024 PCrLJ 1660 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2024 PCrLJ 1660 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 1660 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Muhammad Anees vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 9

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 1660 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Muhammad Anees VS State S. 9(c)---Possession of narcotic substances---Appreciation of evidence---Police witnesses, evidence of---Scope---Prosecution case was that 800 grams Ice and 450 grams charas were recovered from the possession of the accused persons---No doubt police witnesses are as good as other independent witnesses, and conviction can be recorded on their evidence, but their testimony should be reliable, dependable, trustworthy, and confidence worthy---If such qualities are missing in their evidence, no conviction can be passed on the basis of evidence of police witnesses---Number of contradictions between the evidence of prosecution witnesses were noticed, which could not be easily brushed aside---Conduct of the police showed that the investigation had been carried out in a casual and stereotypical manner without making an effort to discover the actual facts/truth---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English