PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 1783 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case Sumaira vs State Ss — 2024 PCrLJ 1783 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2024 PCrLJ 1783 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 1783 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case Sumaira vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 9---G; S. 375-; S. 371-B; S. 9

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 1783 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case Sumaira VS State Ss. 375-a & 371-B---anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial) act (XXX of 2021), S. 9---Gang rape, selling and buying person for purpose of prostitution---Investigation in respect of Scheduled Offences---Quashing of proceedings---Petitioner lodged FIR under S.375-a, P.P.C, against four persons accusing them of ravishing her---During investigation, police found it was not a gang rape and substituted S.375-a, P.P.C with S.371-B, P.P.C---Petitioner disagreed with that findings and contended that it had no legal value because the entire proceedings were conducted in contravention of S.9 of the anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial) act, 2021---Through present petition, petitioner sought quashing of the said proceedings and a direction to re-investigate the case in accordance with law---Held, that anti-Rape (Investigation and Trial) act, 2021, ensured various fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution and to discharge obligations under International law to address the issue of sexual violence and brought offenders to justice---To that end, the act provided for efficient procedures, speedy trials, evidence and matters connected therewith or incidental thereto---Said act aimed to effectively deal with rape and sexual abuse crimes mentioned in its Schedules committed against women and children---Section 9 of the act is mandatory, which conferred special jurisdiction on Special Sexual Offences Investigation Units (SSOIUs) in respect of Scheduled Offences---For that purpose, it mandated the Federal Government to establish SSIOUs for the Capital Territory and the Provincial Governments in every district---During the hearing of this case, it was mentioned that the Punjab Government had not established SSIUOs in several districts even two years after the enactment of the act---High Court gave directions to constitute the requisite SSOIUs immediately and to arrange necessary training for the Police Officers assigned to them as required by law---District Police Officer concerned had submitted a report that SSOIUs(Special Sexual Offences Investigation Units) and Gender Crime Cells comprising female SIs/aSIs, who received training regarding sexual offences and gender crimes had been established in the District under the supervision of the Sub-Divisional Police Officer---S.P. Investigation was the overall in-charge of the Wing---Present case was being investigated by an SSOIU(Special Sexual Offences Investigation Units)--District Police Officer concerned had categorically stated that the investigation of this case was compliant with S.9 of the act---Petition was disposed of in view of the report of District Police Officer concerned.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English