Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 2005 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case Muhammad iqbal Nasir vs State S — 2024 PCrLJ 2005 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation: 2024 PCrLJ 2005 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court: Lahore High Court
Year: 2024
Reporter: PCRLJ
Parties: Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 2005 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case Muhammad iqbal Nasir vs State S
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 265-C---P; S. 29---Q; S. 3; S. 265-C---C; S. 265-C; C---Penal Code (XLV of 1860); General Clauses Act (X of 1897); Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 2005 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case Muhammad iqbal Nasir VS State S. 265-C---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 29---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts. 2 (1)(c) & 164---General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 3 (16)---Document---USB (Universal Serial Bus) flash device---Evidentiary value---Scope---Production of evidence which has become available through modern devices or techniques has been allowed under Art.164 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984---USB is a document which can be produced for inspection of Court and is documentary evidence as defined under Art.2 (1)(c) of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984. Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 2005 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case Muhammad iqbal Nasir VS State Ss. 9 (1)(c)& 48---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 265-C---Copies of USB (Universal Serial Bus) flash device, providing of---Principle---Inspection note of Investigating Officer---Appellant / accused was aggrieved of refusal to provide copy of USB containing video recording of raid and arrest of accused, duly prepared by authorities---Validity---USB statedly contained video recording of raid i.e. detail of occurrence as well as place of occurrence as well as spot of occurrence with more exactness and accuracy as compared to inspection notes prepared by investigating officer---Liberal / wide and purposeful interpretation of S.265-C (1)(d), Cr.P.C., included supply of copy of USB containing video recording of occurrence as well as place of occurrence also with the copy of inspection notes as "a document regarding occurrence and place of occurrence" in more accurate form / shape of inspection notes of place of occurrence---High Court directed Trial Court to provide copy of USB to appellant / accused---High Court further directed that copies of USB in question should also be provided to all other accused person facing trial---Appeal was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PCRLJ

2024 PCrLJ 1098 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESheraz Ahmad VS State Ss. 295-A, 295-B, 295-C, 298-C, 109 & 34---prevention ofelectronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), S. 11---Application of the…
2024 PCrLJ 1610 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMuzamil VS State Sched. I, Entries Nos. 3 & 4---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 376(2), 506-B & 34---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), S. 7-…
2024 PCrLJ 1462 ISLAMABADMuhammad Haseeb VS State S. 497---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), Ss. 21 & 24---Offences against modesty of a natural pers…
2024 PCrLJ 1462 ISLAMABADMuhammad Haseeb VS State S. 497---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016),Ss. 21 & 24---Offences against modesty of a natural perso…
2024 PCrLJ 1521 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANCitation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 1521 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Abdul Hadi alias Babul VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1…
2024 PCrLJ 993 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTFazal nawaz alias muhammad shafi VS State S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Abscondence of the accused-…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English