Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 273 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case SHADEEULLAH vs State S — 2024 PCrLJ 273 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation: 2024 PCrLJ 273 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court: Balochistan High Court
Year: 2024
Reporter: PCRLJ
Parties: Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 273 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case SHADEEULLAH vs State S
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 302

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 273 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case SHADEEULLAH VS State S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Ocular account proved---Accused was charged for committing murder of his brother by firing---Ocular account was supported by medical evidence---Ocular account of the incident had been furnished by parents of deceased and an eye-witness---Said witnesses recorded their statements on oath wherein they reiterated the contents of the application on the basis whereof the FIR was registered---Parents of deceased/witnesses identified the accused as the sole culprit---Testimony of the eye-witnesses was consistent on every material point i.e., the nomination of the accused by assigning him the specific role of making fires as the sole culprit, the date, time, and venue of occurrence; and their presence on the spot---Eye-witnesses were cross-examined at length, but nothing could be unearthed showing that either said witnesses were not present on the spot or did not witness the incident themselves, nor they were found inimical towards the accused; as such, there was no reason to discard straightforward, confidence-inspiring, tangible and consistent evidence furnished by them---Ocular account furnished by the prosecution witnesses was in line with the medical view furnished by Medical Officer vide death certificate, wherein it had been mentioned that the deceased died unnatural death by receiving multiple firearm injuries on his vital parts---Appeal against conviction was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PCRLJ

2024 PCrLJ 1098 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESheraz Ahmad VS State Ss. 295-A, 295-B, 295-C, 298-C, 109 & 34---prevention ofelectronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), S. 11---Application of the…
2024 PCrLJ 1610 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMuzamil VS State Sched. I, Entries Nos. 3 & 4---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 376(2), 506-B & 34---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), S. 7-…
2024 PCrLJ 1462 ISLAMABADMuhammad Haseeb VS State S. 497---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), Ss. 21 & 24---Offences against modesty of a natural pers…
2024 PCrLJ 1462 ISLAMABADMuhammad Haseeb VS State S. 497---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016),Ss. 21 & 24---Offences against modesty of a natural perso…
2024 PCrLJ 1521 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANCitation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 1521 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Abdul Hadi alias Babul VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1…
2024 PCrLJ 993 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTFazal nawaz alias muhammad shafi VS State S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Abscondence of the accused-…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English