Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 891 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Safar Gul vs State Ss — 2024 PCrLJ 891 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation: 2024 PCrLJ 891 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court: Balochistan High Court
Year: 2024
Reporter: PCRLJ
Parties: Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 891 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Safar Gul vs State Ss
Subject matter: Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 891 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Safar Gul VS State Ss. 302(b), 324, 109 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, abetment, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Minor contractions and discrepancies---Inconsequential---Accused were charged for committing murder of the uncle of complainant by firing---At least three eye-witnesses recorded their statements and identified the accused as he was previously known to them, therefore there was no question of misidentification---Allegedly, there were certain discrepancies and inconsistencies in the statements of the eye-witnesses---However, such discrepancies or contradictions were trivial in nature and considering the long absconsion of the accused, these immaterial discrepancies were natural and if such minor contradictions having no significance were given importance then there would hardly be any conviction---Nomination of the accused immediately after the incident; the statements of the eye-witnesses remaining unshaken; no possibility of wrong nomination or misidentification of the accused as he was saddled with attribution of killing the deceased; no justification provided to replace the actual murderer with the accused by the complainant party; and Medico Legal Certificate of deceased completely supported the ocular account of the witnesses---Circumstances established that the prosecution successfully brought home the charge against the accused beyond any shadow of doubt---Appeal was accordingly dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PCRLJ

2024 PCrLJ 1098 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESheraz Ahmad VS State Ss. 295-A, 295-B, 295-C, 298-C, 109 & 34---prevention ofelectronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), S. 11---Application of the…
2024 PCrLJ 1610 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMuzamil VS State Sched. I, Entries Nos. 3 & 4---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 376(2), 506-B & 34---Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), S. 7-…
2024 PCrLJ 1462 ISLAMABADMuhammad Haseeb VS State S. 497---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), Ss. 21 & 24---Offences against modesty of a natural pers…
2024 PCrLJ 1462 ISLAMABADMuhammad Haseeb VS State S. 497---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016),Ss. 21 & 24---Offences against modesty of a natural perso…
2024 PCrLJ 1521 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANCitation Name: 2024 PCrLJ 1521 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Abdul Hadi alias Babul VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1…
2024 PCrLJ 993 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTFazal nawaz alias muhammad shafi VS State S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Abscondence of the accused-…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English