FEDERAL REVENUE ALLIANCE EMPLOYEES UNION vs FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE Regln — 2024 PLC 18 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation: 2024 PLC 18 ISLAMABAD
Court: Islamabad High Court
Year: 2024
Reporter: PLC
Parties: FEDERAL REVENUE ALLIANCE EMPLOYEES UNION vs FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE Regln
Subject matter: Constitutional
Provisions referred to: S. 1; S. 2; S. 12; S. 14; Industrial Relations Act (IV of 2008); Industrial Relations Act (X of 2012); Industrial Relations Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

FEDERAL REVENUE ALLIANCE EMPLOYEES UNION VS FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE Regln. 8(1)---Industrial Relations Act (IV of 2008), S.1(3)(b)---Industrial Relations Act (X of 2012), S.2(xxxiii)---Registration as a trade union, matter of---Intra Court appeal filed by the employees---Maintainability---National Industrial Relations Commission ('N.I.R.C.') allowed registration of few employees of Federal Board of Revenue ('employees') as a trade union( by the name of Federal Revenue Alliance Employees' Union), against which order Federal Board of Revenue ('F.B.R.') filed a constitutional petition---Constitutional petition was allowed---Employees preferred appeal against the said order passed in the constitutional petition---Held, that F.B.R. could not have filed an appeal against the order passed by the Chairman, N.I.R.C., before the Full Bench, N.I.R.C. as S. 12 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2012 ('I.R.A., 2012') conferred a right of appeal against an order passed by the Registrar Trade Unions ('R.T.U.') only to a trade union, its members or an officer of the trade union; which provision did not confer such a right of appeal on the employer---Law did not confer a right of appeal, revision or review on the employer against the order passed by the Chairman, N.I.R.C.---Even S. 14 of the ('I.R.A.2008') conferred a right of appeal on a trade union aggrieved by an order for the cancellation of the registration of a trade union; it conferred no such right on the employer---Intra Court Appeal was maintainable, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PLC

2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S.5(1)---appeal before the Service Tribunal---Project Director of a hospital---Locus sta…
2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S.5(1)---additional charge of a post---Civil servant---Scope ---assailing order before t…
2024 PLC(CS) 1561 GILGIT-BALTISTAN-SERVICE TRIBUNALENGINEER Dr. NAZIR HUSSAIN VS PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT S. 5(1)---additional charge, withdrawal of---authority, powers of---Challenging of withd…
2024 PLC(CS) 1085 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIRMASOODA IQBAL, ELEMENTARY TEACHER, GOVERNMENT GIRLS MIDDLE SCHOOL AAHI, DISTRICT BHIMBER VS SECRETARY ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION Ord…
2024 PLC 338 SUPREME-COURTWAQAR AHMED VS The FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment Division, Islamabad art. 199---Employees engaged throug…
2024 PLC 314 SUPREME-COURTTOWN ADMINISTRATION VS MOHAMMAD KHALID Sched., S.Os. 1(b), 1(e) & 12---Employees employed for a continuous period exceeding nine months---Di…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English