PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

State vs IRFAN NAWAZ MEMON, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE Source of authority — 2024 PLD 256 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation
2024 PLD 256 ISLAMABAD
Court
Islamabad High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
PLD
Parties
State vs IRFAN NAWAZ MEMON, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE Source of authority
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

State VS IRFAN NAWAZ MEMON, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE Source of authority---Actions of public officials---Accountability---In Pakistan, like other Constitutional states, public authority flows from the Constitution and Constitution alone---There is no other source of authority---Feature distinguishing legal authority from brute force is legitimacy---In a polity functioning under the Constitution, the concept of de facto power is akin to the concept of brute force, which is devoid of legitimacy---Only power that is clothed with legality and legitimacy is that which flows from the law and the Constitution and is thus de jure---Existence and exercise of de facto power in a state administered under a Constitution is the manifestation of weak Constitutionalism and speaks to the need to reduce the gap between the law and its implementation---Courts of law established under the Constitution and exercising authority vested by law, can never recognize or legitimize de facto power (referred to as 'ground realities' in the vernacular)---Doing so would delegitimize the Courts themselves---In a rule of law, system, power and responsibility go hand-in-hand---Any public official who is vested with authority and exercises it in the name of the State and its citizens, cannot shun the responsibility that comes with exercise of power---Deputy Commissioner or police officer has no authority other than that vested by law and no jurisdiction to exercise it except as mandated by law---Actions of public officials are protected by law in so far as they are backed by it---Their source of authority over fellow citizens is the authority of law, not personal authority that can be exercised at whim or on the basis of an illegal command---Public officials are responsible and accountable for their actions just as private citizens, if not more---Doctrine of agency underlying personal liability is fully applicable to the actions of public office holders.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English