PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

PRODUCTION ENGINEER PPL, I/C, KANDHKOT vs AZIZULLAH S — 2024 PLD 259 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2024 PLD 259 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
PLD
Parties
PRODUCTION ENGINEER PPL, I/C, KANDHKOT vs AZIZULLAH S
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 10; S. 23---C; S. 4---S; Limitation Act (IX of 1908); Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908); Arbitration Act (X of 1940); Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

PRODUCTION ENGINEER PPL, I/C, KANDHKOT VS AZIZULLAH S. 10(2)---Limitation Act (IX of 1908), S. 23---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. VII, R. 11---Arbitration Act (X of 1940), S.4---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 42 & 54---Second appeal---Suit for declaration and injunction---Judgments at variance---Continuing cause of action---Acquisition of land---Compensation, right of grantee---Appellants/authorities installed a well for public welfare in land granted to respondent/plaintiff in accordance with law---Respondent/ plaintiff was aggrieved of non-payment of compensation to him and suit filed by him was dismissed by Trial Court but Lower Appellate Court decreed the same---Validity---In case of continuing breach of a contract and case of an ongoing wrong independent of the contract, a fresh period of limitation begins to run at every moment of the time during which breach or wrong, as the case may be, continues---Respondent/plaintiff was entitled to receive compensation in the event of land acquired for public purposes---Land was granted to appellants/authorities for installation of a well which was inherently a public purpose---Trial Court failed to appreciate legal and factual aspects of the same and dismissed the suit of respondent/plaintiff---Lower Appellate Court after discussing facts as well as evidence of parties, including additional evidence, through a well-reasoned judgment rightly decreed the suit of respondent/plaintiff who was a lawful grantee in respect of suit land---Lower Appellate Court did not commit any illegality as the respondent/plaintiff was entitled to compensation---Where there were conflicting verdicts, decision made by Lower Appellate Court should be accorded greater deference and esteem unless it was demonstrated from available documentation that such determination lacked substantiation from evidentiary support---High Court declined to interfere in judgment and decree passed by Lower Appellate Court---Second appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English