PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

COLLECTOR, SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, ISLAMABAD vs CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ISLAMABAD S — 2024 PTD 275 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2024 PTD 275 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
PTD
Parties
COLLECTOR, SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, ISLAMABAD vs CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ISLAMABAD S
Subject matter
Tax & Customs
Provisions referred to
S. 73---; S. 73

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

COLLECTOR, SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE, ISLAMABAD VS CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SALES TAX, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ISLAMABAD S. 73---adjustment of input tax---Requirement of S.73 of the Sales Tax act, 1990, non-compliance of---Question was, whether or not, non-compliance of requirement of S. 73 of the Sales Tax act, 1990 ('the act, 1990') would be sufficient for the department to disallow input tax adjustment and for an order for recovery of the principal amount along with default surcharge and penalty---appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal preferred by the taxpayer against disallowance of the input tax adjustment by assistant Collector, which order was assailed by the Collector / Department by filing Sales Tax Reference---Validity---Record revealed that assistant Collector disallowed the input tax adjustment of the respondent/registered person on the ground that the payment had not been made in accordance with the requirement of S. 73 of the act, 1990---Section 73 of the act 1990 required payment of an amount for a transaction exceeding the value of Rs. 50,000/ = however, in the present case, the amount involved was less than Rs.50,000/=---It was not the case of the applicant / department that the respondent was claiming input tax adjustment against fake invoices or had evaded the payment of tax---Section 73 of the act, 1990 did not prescribe the penalty of disallowing the input adjustment for failure to show compliance with the requirement of S.73 of the act, 1990---appellate Tribunal had upheld the penalty of Rs. 5,000/= imposed on respondent for not showing compliance with the requirement of S.73 of the act, 1990---applicant department had failed to give reason for interference of the High Court in the order passed by the appellate Tribunal---Sales Tax Reference filed by the department was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PTD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English