PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

NOOR UL HAQ vs The GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary Balochistan Ss — 2024 PTD 342 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2024 PTD 342 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
PTD
Parties
NOOR UL HAQ vs The GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary Balochistan Ss
Subject matter
Tax & Customs
Provisions referred to
Balochistan Revenue Authority Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

NOOR UL HAQ VS The GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary Balochistan Ss.14 & 53---Balochistan Sales Tax Special Procedure (Withholding) Rules, 2018, Rr.1(4) & 3---Taxing statute---Applicability---Sale tax, recovery of---Scope---Petitioner company was aggrieved of notice issued by Project Director for recovery of sales tax not deposited---Validity---Enforcement of provisions of Balochistan Revenue Authority Act, 2015, was in the exclusive jurisdiction of the Revenue Authority---Project Director had no power under Balochistan Revenue Authority Act, 2015, to initiate recovery proceedings for tax not withheld---Even if withholding agent had failed to deduct a deductible amount under Balochistan Revenue Authority Act, 2015, then an officer of the Authority only was authorized to initiate and enforce recovery of such withholding tax---Although power of Legislature to enact retrospective law was well recognized but in absence of express provision or necessary implication even the laws which had been made retrospectively applicable could neither be applied to transactions in question, which were past and closed nor could vested rights be taken away or destroyed---High Court set aside recovery notice issued to petitioner as the same was without lawful authority and was a result of misreading of relevant provision of Balochistan Revenue Authority Act, 2015---Constitutional petition was allowed, in circumstances. Citation Name: 2024 PTD 342 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case NOOR UL HAQ VS The GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary Balochistan Retrospective effect---Scope---Statute, which is procedural in nature, can operate retrospectively unless it affects an existing right on the date of promulgation or causes injustice or prejudice to a substantive right---If such statute is of such character that it may tend to promote justice without any consequential embarrassment or detriment to any of the parties concerned, Courts favourably incline towards giving effect to such procedural statute retrospectively.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PTD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English