PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2024 PTD 818 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case SHAH STEEL INDUSTRY vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Federal Secretary Finance and Revenue Division, Islamabad Ss — 2024 PTD 818 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation
2024 PTD 818 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court
Peshawar High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
PTD
Parties
Citation Name: 2024 PTD 818 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case SHAH STEEL INDUSTRY vs FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Federal Secretary Finance and Revenue Division, Islamabad Ss
Subject matter
Tax & Customs
Provisions referred to
S. 109; S. 14; Income Tax Ordinance

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 PTD 818 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case SHAH STEEL INDUSTRY VS FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Federal Secretary Finance and Revenue Division, Islamabad Ss. 53, 159, 235 & 109a [as inserted through Finance act, 2019]---Sales Tax act (VII of 1990), Ss. 3 & 14---Constitution of Pakistan, art.247---Tax exemption---Electricity consumption---Petitioners / tax payers were running their industrial units in erstwhile Federally administered Tribal area and after 25th Constitutional amendment, sought exemption from income tax---authorities contended that petitioners' manufacturing units were involved in manufacturing of products which reached settled area, therefore, petitioners could not claim blanket exemption from levy of income tax unless their taxable activities relating to sale of products was verified by the authorities---Validity---This was a valid objection prior to promulgation of 25th Constitutional amendment, as at the relevant time, persons, who were domiciled in erstwhile FaTa, were enjoying immunity from income tax as the same was never extended to erstwhile FaTa---Under new dispensation, exemption provided under S. 109a of Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 through Finance act, 2019, was specific to the person, who was permanent resident of erstwhile FaTa and was generating his income from business which was situated at erstwhile FaTa or taxable activities which he carried there---High Court declared that demand of authorities of income tax/advance income under Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, from petitioners whose registered offices were situated in erstwhile FaTa/PaTa through their monthly electricity bills was illegal and without lawful authority---High Court further declared that demand of authorities for extra tax and further tax under Sales Tax act, 1990, from petitioners who had established their manufacturing units at erstwhile FaTa/PaTa, and were registered with the authorities under S. 14 of Sales Tax act, 1990 and had active tax profiles on relevant portal of FBR was illegal and without lawful authority---High Court directed electricity distribution companies PESCO/TESCO not to demand income tax under Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and extra tax/further tax under Sales Tax act, 1990, from petitioners who had fulfilled said two conditions---Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2024 PTD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English