ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence vs RASHID BUILDERS (PVT

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence VS RASHID BUILDERS (PVT.) LIMITED S. 10---Suit for recovery of money---Contractual liabilities---"But-for" Test---Applicability---Delay caused in completion of project---Determination---Concurrent findings of facts by two Courts below---Misreading and non-reading of evidence---Respondent/plaintiff filed suit for recovery of money along with costs for delay caused in completion of contract due to fault on the part of appellant/authorities---Judgment and decree passed by Trial Court was maintained by High Court---Validity---Nature of delays meant that respondent/plaintiff was eligible for multiple extensions of time, and appellants/authorities granted such extensions---Inclement weather was beyond the control of appellants/authorities and respondent/plaintiff was allowed extension of time---When extensions of time were granted and the project was completed then question was why respondent/plaintiff initiated recovery proceedings---Such recovery proceedings were nothing but an effort to avoid paying the refund that appellants/authorities were rightfully owed by respondent/plaintiff---"But-for" Test, was to ask if delays by respondent/plaintiff were independent of the delays by appellants/ authorities---If delays of respondent/plaintiff were only happening because appellants/authorities had caused delays first, then the delays of appellants/authorities were the root cause---If respondent/defendant had also been causing delays regardless of the actions of appellants/ authorities, then the delays of respondent/plaintiff were independent---Applying the "But-For" Testmeant that the delays of respondent/ plaintiff were independent and he was not entitled to recover amount through the suit---Supreme Court set aside conclusions arrived at by High Court as well as Trial Court which were patently improbable and perverse----Supreme Court dismissed the suit filed by respondent/ plaintiff and set aside the judgments and decrees passed by two Courts below---Appeal was allowed.

ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence vs RASHID BUILDERS (PVT — 2024 SCMR 1816 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2024 SCMR