PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

FAZLI AKBAR KHAN vs GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through District Collector, Mardan Ss — 2024 SCMR 2071 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation
2024 SCMR 2071 SUPREME-COURT
Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year
2024
Reporter
SCMR
Parties
FAZLI AKBAR KHAN vs GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through District Collector, Mardan Ss
Provisions referred to
Land Acquisition Act

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

FAZLI AKBAR KHAN VS GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through District Collector, Mardan Ss. 18, 30 & 31---Land acquisition---Compensation---Reference petition filed before the Collector---Limitation---Barred by time---Petitioners' (land owners) grievance was related to the Order, dated 22.04.2014,of the Referee Court, but instead they impugned the Order of the Collector, dated 02.11.2011---Order of the Collector made it quite clear that the Referee Court was being sent the Reference petition for disposal under sections 30 and 31 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ('Act') only and not under section 18 of the Act, as the reference on the face of it was barred by limitation---Award was passed on 11.10.2010, and the Reference petition was filed before the Collector by the petitioners, on 26.10.2011, exactly a year later---Petitioners were indeed barred by time by virtue of section 18 of the Act and thus the Collector's Order accurately referred the matter to the Referee Court under sections 30 and 31 of the Act only---Moreover, it was a matter of record that notification under section 4 of the Act was duly issued on 06.03.2010 and endorsement to that effect was duly issued on 07.09.2010, whereafter the petitioners filed their objections, which were duly considered by the Collector before passing the award on 11.10.2010---This simple fact alone pointed out that the petitioners took part in acquisition process and that the Reference petition before the Collector filed on 26.10.2011 was merely an afterthought, perhaps intended to get more money for their land---Moreover, it was also an admitted position that no appeal, as required under section 18-B of the Act, was filed by the petitioners against the said award---Petitioners realized the fault in their legal strategy, therefore, impugned the Order dated 02.11.2011 of the Collector rather than that of the Referee Court before the High Court---However, the High Court realized this and quite rightly held that the challenge to the Collector's Order was time barred and attracted the doctrine of laches---Petition was dismissed and leave to appeal was refused.

Other judgments reported in 2024 SCMR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English