PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Population Welfare Department, Lahore vs SHEHZAD ANJUM O — 2024 SCMR 766 SUPREME-COURT

Case information

Citation
2024 SCMR 766 SUPREME-COURT
Court
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Year
2024
Reporter
SCMR
Parties
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Population Welfare Department, Lahore vs SHEHZAD ANJUM O
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
Civil Procedure Code

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Population Welfare Department, Lahore VS SHEHZAD ANJUM O.II, R. 2---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Civil service---Regularization in service---Second constitutional petition filed on the basis of the same cause of action which was decided in the first constitutional petition---Maintainability---Respondents (employees) had sought their regularization from the date of their appointment in the first constitutional petition ('the first petition') filed before the High Court, which was disposed of by the High Court directing that the respondents be regularized in terms of the said judgment---If the respondents were not satisfied with the said judgment they should have appealed the same or if the same was not implemented they should have sought its implementation, which could have been by invoking the contempt jurisdiction of the High Court---In any event on the same cause of action, and one which had been decided pursuant to the judgment in the first petition, another constitutional petition ('the second petition') was not maintainable, and as no fresh cause of action had accrued to the respondents---This critical aspect of the case was overlooked by the Single Judge of the High Court who passed the order in the second petition---Though this is not the respondents' case, if for the sake of argument it is assumed that in the first petition the respondents had only sought their regularization, and after they were regularized they wanted the regularization to take effect from the date of their initial appointment on contract basis, they could not seek this relief subsequently in the second petition because of the restriction in Order II, Rule 2 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908---Petition for leave to appeal was converted into appeal and allowed, and the second petition filed by the respondents was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2024 SCMR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English