Citation Name: 2024 YLR 1024 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case SULEMAN SHAH vs Mian NISAR AHMAD (deceased) S — 2024 YLR 1024 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation: 2024 YLR 1024 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court: Peshawar High Court
Year: 2024
Reporter: YLR
Parties: Citation Name: 2024 YLR 1024 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case SULEMAN SHAH vs Mian NISAR AHMAD (deceased) S
Subject matter: Civil
Provisions referred to: S. 11---C

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 YLR 1024 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case SULEMAN SHAH VS Mian NISAR AHMAD (deceased) S. 11---Compensation, receipt of---Proof---Trial Court decreed the suit filed by the appellants holding that the acquired land was theirs and directed the respondents to pay to the appellants the compensation they (respondents) had received from the acquiring department--- Validity--- Findings (payment to the appellants) of the Trial Court were not borne out from the case evidence as no "Qabz-ul-Wasool" was produced before the Trial Court by the appellants nor any person from the acquiring department/ Land Acquisition Collector appeared to testify that the respondents had received the compensation which was earmarked for the suit-land---Whenever a Government Department pays any amount or compensation to anyone as landowner, a complete record is maintained, thus it was obligatory to have requested the Trial Court to requisition the acquisition record of their land from the office of concerned Collector so that it could have been made known that the respondents had actually received the compensation---In absence of any record to said effect, no effective finding on the issue that the respondents had received the compensation of the appellant's land could be given for which remand of case was must so that after ascertaining the said fact of the case an effective finding could be returned---No doubt, remand of a case injects a new life of years into the case and same also overburdens the Court but sometimes it becomes necessary as in absence of the material evidence no justice can be administered---High Court set-aside the impugned judgment and decree and remanded the case to decide afresh by requisitioning acquisition record---Appeal was disposed of accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2024 YLR

2024 YLR 2656 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMuhammad Maqsood VS State Ss. 324, 353 & 34---anti-Terrorism act (XXVII of 1997), S. 7---Sindh arms act (V of 2013), S. 23(1)(a)---attempt t…
2024 YLR 2635 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHAbdul Karim VS State S. 497---Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (VII of 1947),Ss. 4, 5, 8 & 23---Payments through informal banking channel of…
2024 YLR 2619 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBijar alias Bijli VS State Ss. 324, 353, 225, 337-a(i), 337-F(i), 337-H(2), 147, 148 & 149---Sindh arms act (V of 2013), S. 24---anti-Terror…
2024 YLR 2586 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHFayaz alias Fayaz Hussain VS State Ss. 302(b), 324, 353, 337-F(iii), 337-F(v), 337-H(2), 506(2), 148 & 149---anti-Terrorism act (XXVII of 19…
2024 YLR 2561 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMuhammad Bilal VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477-A & 109---Prevention of Corruption Act (II…
2024 YLR 1497 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHKHALID VS State Minor contradictions in evidence---In consequential---Every contradiction can not take place of a material contradiction and…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English