Citation Name: 2024 YLR 1624 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case JAN MUHAMMAD vs State S — 2024 YLR 1624 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation: 2024 YLR 1624 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court: Balochistan High Court
Year: 2024
Reporter: YLR
Parties: Citation Name: 2024 YLR 1624 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case JAN MUHAMMAD vs State S
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 497---P; Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 YLR 1624 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case JAN MUHAMMAD VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 324, 392, 353 & 186---Attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, robbery, assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty, obstructing public servant in discharge of his public functions---Bail, grant of---Accused suffering from fire-arm injuries on vital parts of body---Accused had been apprehended in an injured condition due to retaliation by police, which reached the place of occurrence soon after the commission of the alleged robbery by the accused along with other companions---Record transpired that an application was filed by the accused before the Trial Court for their medical treatment with the contention that no proper medical facility was available in District Jail Ward---In pursuance thereof, the Trial Court directed the jail authorities to shift the accused to hospital for proper treatment---Perusal of the opinion of the Police Surgeon depicted that one of the accused was admitted to Surgical Unit, due to laparotomy caused by firearms, whereas other accused was admitted to Orthopedic Ward due to fractures in left humerus and tibia bones caused by firearms---According to the Police Surgeon's opinion, the accused's condition was stable, however, the medical documents annexed with the record reflected that the injuries caused by the firearms were on vital parts, which required extensive care and treatment---From the record, it was manifest that the applicants were under treatment for more than one and half months and still their wounds had not healed---Object of the criminal trial was that the accused was made to face the trial and not to punish undertrial prisoner for the alleged offence---Bail application was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 YLR

2024 YLR 2656 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMuhammad Maqsood VS State Ss. 324, 353 & 34---anti-Terrorism act (XXVII of 1997), S. 7---Sindh arms act (V of 2013), S. 23(1)(a)---attempt t…
2024 YLR 2635 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHAbdul Karim VS State S. 497---Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (VII of 1947),Ss. 4, 5, 8 & 23---Payments through informal banking channel of…
2024 YLR 2619 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBijar alias Bijli VS State Ss. 324, 353, 225, 337-a(i), 337-F(i), 337-H(2), 147, 148 & 149---Sindh arms act (V of 2013), S. 24---anti-Terror…
2024 YLR 2586 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHFayaz alias Fayaz Hussain VS State Ss. 302(b), 324, 353, 337-F(iii), 337-F(v), 337-H(2), 506(2), 148 & 149---anti-Terrorism act (XXVII of 19…
2024 YLR 2561 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMuhammad Bilal VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477-A & 109---Prevention of Corruption Act (II…
2024 YLR 1497 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHKHALID VS State Minor contradictions in evidence---In consequential---Every contradiction can not take place of a material contradiction and…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English