Citation Name: 2024 YLR 1628 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case Syed FAHEEM UL HASSAN vs INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB art — 2024 YLR 1628 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation: 2024 YLR 1628 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court: Lahore High Court
Year: 2024
Reporter: YLR
Parties: Citation Name: 2024 YLR 1628 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case Syed FAHEEM UL HASSAN vs INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB art
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 392

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 YLR 1628 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREBookmark this Case Syed FAHEEM UL HASSAN VS INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB art.199---Habeas corpus petition---Recovery of detenu---Scope---Petitioner sought recovery of his brother from the illegal confinement of Police---Police claimed that the detenu required in number of cases was arrested in a case registered under S. 392, P.P.C., being nominated through supplementary statement of the complainant and while remaining on physical remand with police had been lodged to judicial custody---Validity---If the accused was in a judicial custody in another case, granting of further physical remand by the Magistrate in case FIR under S. 392, P.P.C., was not illegal, but in order to further ascertain the contention of the petitioner that detenu was not lodged to judicial custody pursuant to order of Magistrate dated 29.12.2023 in case under Ss. 392/411, P.P.C., a report from Superintendent District Jail was requisitioned which was received to the effect that detenu was not lodged in the jail pursuant to order of Magistrate dated 29.12.2023 in FIR under Ss. 392/411, P.P.C.---Thus, High Court by virtue of order dated 20.02.2024 directed Capital City Police Officer to conduct an inquiry in the matter, register a criminal case against delinquent police officers/ officials and submit report to High Court---Said report had been submitted---Capital City Police Officer, after conducting inquiry, had found the delinquent Police Officials as responsible for committing criminal breach of duty and in compliance whereof an FIR under art. 155(1)(c) of the Police Order, 2002, stood registered---Petitioner stated that now after granting bail to the detenu by concerned Court he had been set at liberty---as Police had also conceded the commission of criminal act by respondents, therefore, constitution petition stood disposed of.

Other judgments reported in 2024 YLR

2024 YLR 2656 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMuhammad Maqsood VS State Ss. 324, 353 & 34---anti-Terrorism act (XXVII of 1997), S. 7---Sindh arms act (V of 2013), S. 23(1)(a)---attempt t…
2024 YLR 2635 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHAbdul Karim VS State S. 497---Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (VII of 1947),Ss. 4, 5, 8 & 23---Payments through informal banking channel of…
2024 YLR 2619 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBijar alias Bijli VS State Ss. 324, 353, 225, 337-a(i), 337-F(i), 337-H(2), 147, 148 & 149---Sindh arms act (V of 2013), S. 24---anti-Terror…
2024 YLR 2586 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHFayaz alias Fayaz Hussain VS State Ss. 302(b), 324, 353, 337-F(iii), 337-F(v), 337-H(2), 506(2), 148 & 149---anti-Terrorism act (XXVII of 19…
2024 YLR 2561 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMuhammad Bilal VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477-A & 109---Prevention of Corruption Act (II…
2024 YLR 1497 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHKHALID VS State Minor contradictions in evidence---In consequential---Every contradiction can not take place of a material contradiction and…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English