PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2024 YLR 2204 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Mir Agha vs State Ss — 2024 YLR 2204 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2024 YLR 2204 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
YLR
Parties
Citation Name: 2024 YLR 2204 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Mir Agha vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 YLR 2204 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case Mir Agha VS State Ss. 302(b), 387, 404 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, putting person in fear of death or of grievous hurt in order to commit extortion, dishonest misappropriation of property possessed by deceased person at the time of his death, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---CCTV footage---Scope---Accused were charged for committing murder of the deceased by strangulation for looting purpose---Accused were identified through CCTV footage, taken from the nearby offices and the cameras installed in the streets however, in such behalf it was observed from the record that the person shown in the said CCTV footages had muffled their faces and they also wore gloves---If the culprits were having muffles on their faces and gloves on their hands, then question arose that as to how they were identified by the prosecution as the persons, who had committed the crime---Besides, if the accused persons were wearing gloves, then no question arose for their finger prints and its matching by the Forensic Science Laboratory Expert---Even otherwise, the prosecution had failed to mention that from which offices, houses or streets the said CCTV footages were taken and why the concerned persons of said offices or houses were not produced in the Court in order to diminish any sort of ambiguity in the case of prosecution---Thus, the prosecution had failed to establish the charge against the accused persons beyond the shadow of reasonable doubts---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English