PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2024 YLR 309 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case AMIR MEHMOOD vs State S — 2024 YLR 309 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation
2024 YLR 309 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court
Peshawar High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
YLR
Parties
Citation Name: 2024 YLR 309 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case AMIR MEHMOOD vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 302

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 YLR 309 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case AMIR MEHMOOD VS State S. 302(b)---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 129(g)--- Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Withholding material witnesses---Consequential---Accused was charged for committing murder of the father-in-law of complainant by firing---Per statement of eye-witnesses, two persons were attracted to the spot after 6/7 minutes of the occurrence and thereafter many others were also attracted to the spot---One of the said persons arranged the cot and the dead body of the deceased was shifted to the police station in vehicle of another person by said two persons---However, driver of the vehicle and other two persons had not been produced as witnesses during the trial---If, said witnesses could furnish their account it would have strengthened the case of the prosecution, but not to produce them as prosecution witnesses, adversely affected the case in view of the provisions of Art.129(g) of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984---By not producing material witnesses, an inference could be drawn that had they stepped into the witness box, they would have not supported the prosecution's case---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English