PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2024 YLR 309 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case AMIR MEHMOOD vs State S — 2024 YLR 309 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT

Case information

Citation
2024 YLR 309 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT
Court
Peshawar High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
YLR
Parties
Citation Name: 2024 YLR 309 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case AMIR MEHMOOD vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 302

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 YLR 309 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURTBookmark this Case AMIR MEHMOOD VS State S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Presence of eye-witnesses at the place of occurrence doubtful---Accused was charged for committing murder of the father-in-law of complainant by firing---Ocular account consisted of the statements of the complainant and her son---According to the said witnesses of the ocular account, the accused duly equipped with firearm made firing at them, as a result of which, the deceased got hit and died on the spot---Admittedly, eye-witnesses were not the identifiers of the dead body of the deceased before the local police as well as before the doctor, rather it was identified by other witnesses, who were not the eye-witnesses of the occurrence---Similarly, eye-witnesses on their turn stated in their respective statements that after lodging the report in the police station they proceeded to their house, whereas, the deceased was taken to the hospital---Complainant stated that due to grief she had not counted the number of fire shots made by the accused upon them---Caliber of weapon was also not mentioned in the FIR---Son of complainant stated in his in cross-examination that the accused was armed with Kalashnikov and he was acquainted with the same---Said witness stated that the report was read over to him but he had not disclosed to the police that the accused was armed with Kalashnikov---Non disclosure of kind and bore of the weapon used in the commission of the offence despite the fact that eye-witness could identify the arms with its bores was a strong circumstance which made presence of one of the eye-witnesses at the fateful time on the scene of occurrence highly doubtful---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English