PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

JAHANGIR KHAN vs State Ss — 2024 YLR 318 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2024 YLR 318 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2024
Reporter
YLR
Parties
JAHANGIR KHAN vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 24---C; S. 561-; S. 161; S. 491; Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

JAHANGIR KHAN VS State Ss. 324, 353, 399, 402, 148 & 149---Sindh arms act (V of 2013), S. 24---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 561-a---Inherent powers of High Court---Quashing of orders---Summary submitted by the Investigating Officer for disposal of the case/FIR, under "a" class was disapproved by the Magistrate---Validity---Record showed that it was a case of police encounter wherein brother of the complainant died---In the case in hand the first Investigating Officer who recorded the statements under S. 161, Cr.P.C. and visited the place of occurrence was of the opinion that the case was liable to be disposed of under "a" class and such report was concurred by the prosecution---However, while assigning the reasons, Magistrate ordered for further investigation which too was conducted and result was the same---In the case in hand it was second Investigation Officer who conducted the investigation of the present case and after the investigation he too recommended the case to be disposed of under "a" class---However on perusal of entire investigation reports it reflected that only applications filed by the brother and the mother of the deceased were considered as second version and nobody including the mother of deceased was examined by second Investigation Officer though she was not an eye-witness of arrest of the deceased but the application under Ss.22-a & 22-B, Cr.P.C., brought some facts in respect the encounter, and the brother of the deceased who claimed to be an eye-witness and filed application as under S. 491, Cr.P.C. before the encounter, was also not examined during second investigation--- Investigation Officer claimed that they were not traceable which was also reflected from the order of Magistrate wherein it was mentioned that "second party could not be served despite issuance of notice"---Circumstances established that no proper investigation of second version was conducted by the police nor the Magistrate passed order after considering the said facts, therefore the impugned order passed by the Judicial Magistrate was set-aside---High Court directed that since the Police Officials were allegedly involved in the case of fake encounter therefore it would be appropriate that investigation be handed over to the officer not bellow the rank of SSP of another district.

Other judgments reported in 2024 YLR

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English