Citation Name: 2024 YLR 595 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case REHMATULLAH vs State S — 2024 YLR 595 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation: 2024 YLR 595 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court: Balochistan High Court
Year: 2024
Reporter: YLR
Parties: Citation Name: 2024 YLR 595 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case REHMATULLAH vs State S
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 497---P; S. 497; Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2024 YLR 595 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANBookmark this Case REHMATULLAH VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 302, 337-A(ii), 337-F(ii), 147, 148, 149 & 109---Qatl-i-amd, shajjah-i-mudihah, causing badi'ah, rioting, rioting armed with deadly weapon, unlawful assembly, abetment---Bail, refusal of---Plea of statutory delay in conclusion of trial rejected---Accused were charged for committing murder of the nephew of complainant and causing firearm injuries to his son---Though S. 497(1), clause (b), Cr.P.C. stipulated that any one accused of an offence punishable with death, who had been detained for such offence for a continuous period exceeding two years and in case of a woman exceeding one year, and whose trial for such offence had not concluded, was entitled for concession of bail but the perusal of said provision revealed that the bar had been imposed upon those accused who in the opinion of the Court were hardened desperate or dangerous criminals---Perusal of record of present case showed that there was allegation of illegal business of drugs against the accused persons---Record further revealed that on 12.02.2020 the accused persons allegedly attacked upon nephew of complainant and thereafter on 13.02.2020 the nephew of complainant was murdered---Bar contained in proviso to 497(1), Cr.P.C. was attracted to the case of the accused persons and it was not necessary that such bar was only attracted to the case of previous convicts---Bail application being without any merit was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2024 YLR

2024 YLR 2656 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMuhammad Maqsood VS State Ss. 324, 353 & 34---anti-Terrorism act (XXVII of 1997), S. 7---Sindh arms act (V of 2013), S. 23(1)(a)---attempt t…
2024 YLR 2635 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHAbdul Karim VS State S. 497---Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (VII of 1947),Ss. 4, 5, 8 & 23---Payments through informal banking channel of…
2024 YLR 2619 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBijar alias Bijli VS State Ss. 324, 353, 225, 337-a(i), 337-F(i), 337-H(2), 147, 148 & 149---Sindh arms act (V of 2013), S. 24---anti-Terror…
2024 YLR 2586 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHFayaz alias Fayaz Hussain VS State Ss. 302(b), 324, 353, 337-F(iii), 337-F(v), 337-H(2), 506(2), 148 & 149---anti-Terrorism act (XXVII of 19…
2024 YLR 2561 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHMuhammad Bilal VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 477-A & 109---Prevention of Corruption Act (II…
2024 YLR 1497 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHKHALID VS State Minor contradictions in evidence---In consequential---Every contradiction can not take place of a material contradiction and…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English