SAEEDA JILLANI vs Malik SHERAZ ZAFAR Ss — 2025 CLC 1638439 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation: 2025 CLC 1638439 ISLAMABAD
Court: Islamabad High Court
Year: 2025
Reporter: CLC
Parties: SAEEDA JILLANI vs Malik SHERAZ ZAFAR Ss
Provisions referred to: S. 30; S. 14

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

SAEEDA JILLANI VS Malik SHERAZ ZAFAR Ss. 14, 17 & 30---Rules under the arbitration act, 1940 [framed by Lahore High Court], R.10(a)---award, made rule of Court---Locus standi---Objection to award---Duty of Court---Petitioner was aggrieved of award being made rule of the Court and dismissal of objections to the award---Validity---While considering validity of arbitration award within the limbo of S. 30 of arbitration act, 1940, Court does not sit as a Court of appeal and avoids reappraisal of evidence---Parties resorted to arbitration of their free will, thereof, award has become final in relation to facts as well as in law and interference therewith by Court was hardly merited unless there existed patent illegality or specific grounds as enunciated in arbitration act, 1940---award was exceptionable and could be interfered with only in cases where there surfaced an error on the face of record not requiring scrutiny beyond award for discovering the same---award could be filed by not just the arbitrator/umpire but by parties to arbitration proceedings as well---arbitrator/umpire was not obligated under S. 14 of arbitration act, 1940, to provide the parties with signed copies of the award---Provision of S. 14 of arbitration act, 1940, did not pose obstacle before arbitrator/umpire from providing un-signed copies of the award to parties---Where arbitrator/umpire provided the parties with signed copies of the award, they or any of them were at liberty to file the same in Court on the basis of R. 10 of Rules under arbitration act, 1940---High Court declined to interfere in the judgment passed by Trial Court---appeal was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLC

2025 CLC 236 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANMUHAMMAD ALI VS SECRETARY BOARD OF REVENUE, GOVT. OF BALOCHISTAN. Ss. 39, 42 and 54 - Balochistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 - Suit for cancella…
2025 CLC 297 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANMUHAMMAD ALAM VS Malik ZAHOOR AHMED. Ss.42 & 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss. 24, 35a & 115---Suit for declaration and injunction-…
2025 CLC 276 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANALI AKBAR VS Mst. NASEEM. S. 5, Sched---Maintenance allowance of minors---Father, responsibility of---Scope---Definition of maintenance, whi…
2025 CLC 253 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANDAD MUHAMMAD VS NATIONAL DATABASE and REGISTRATION AUTHORITY through Director General NADRA Provincial Headquarter Zarghoon Road, Quetta. Ss…
2025 CLC 1852 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESHABANA PARVEEN VS Malik MOHSIN HASSAN RASHEED Ss. 2(l) & 24---Eviction application---Relationship of landlord and tenant, denial of---Order…
2025 CLC 1852 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESHABANA PARVEEN VS Malik MOHSIN HASSAN RASHEED Words "may" and "shall" used in a section of an Act or an Ordinance---Whether directory or ma…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English