FAYYAZ AHMED vs SPECIAL JUDGE (RENT) O — 2025 CLC 1705 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation: 2025 CLC 1705 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court: Lahore High Court
Year: 2025
Reporter: CLC
Parties: FAYYAZ AHMED vs SPECIAL JUDGE (RENT) O
Subject matter: Civil
Provisions referred to: S. 17---E; Cantonments Rent Restriction Act (IX of 1963); Law Reforms Ordinance

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

FAYYAZ AHMED VS SPECIAL JUDGE (RENT) O.XXI, Rr.100, 101 & 103---Cantonments Rent Restriction Act (IX of 1963), S. 17---Ejectment proceedings---Execution of eviction order---Adjudication of questions as to title, right, interest or possession by the Executing Court---Powers and jurisdiction of Executing Court---Scope---Rule 103 of O. XXI of C.P.C. was substituted through Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972---Under the substituted provision, any party not being judgment-debtor against whom order is made for restoration of possession in terms of O. XXI, R. 101 was permitted to institute a suit to establish rights to claim possession of the property---This position stood changed after the above substitution---Now all the questions arising as to title, right, interest in or possession of immovable property are required to be adjudicated by the Executing Court---The orders passed, in this regard, become conclusive and no separate suit is permitted---The legislature has used the words "adjudicate upon" and "determined by the Court" besides restricting separate suit---Any person other than judgment-debtor dispossessed from immovable property by decree holder, can make an application under O. XXI R. 100 of C.P.C., which then requires investigation in terms of O. XXI R. 100(2) of C.P.C.---Order XXI R. 100 of C.P.C. is to be read with Rules 101 and 103 of Order XXI of C.P.C.---Order XXI R. 101 of C.P.C. provides that the Court can make the order when satisfied that the applicant was in possession on his own account or on account of some person other than judgment-debtor---The scheme of law is such that it confers full jurisdiction upon the Executing Court to decide the issues involved therein.

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLC

2025 CLC 236 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANMUHAMMAD ALI VS SECRETARY BOARD OF REVENUE, GOVT. OF BALOCHISTAN. Ss. 39, 42 and 54 - Balochistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 - Suit for cancella…
2025 CLC 297 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANMUHAMMAD ALAM VS Malik ZAHOOR AHMED. Ss.42 & 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss. 24, 35a & 115---Suit for declaration and injunction-…
2025 CLC 276 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANALI AKBAR VS Mst. NASEEM. S. 5, Sched---Maintenance allowance of minors---Father, responsibility of---Scope---Definition of maintenance, whi…
2025 CLC 253 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANDAD MUHAMMAD VS NATIONAL DATABASE and REGISTRATION AUTHORITY through Director General NADRA Provincial Headquarter Zarghoon Road, Quetta. Ss…
2025 CLC 1852 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESHABANA PARVEEN VS Malik MOHSIN HASSAN RASHEED Ss. 2(l) & 24---Eviction application---Relationship of landlord and tenant, denial of---Order…
2025 CLC 1852 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESHABANA PARVEEN VS Malik MOHSIN HASSAN RASHEED Words "may" and "shall" used in a section of an Act or an Ordinance---Whether directory or ma…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English