Citation Name: 2025 CLC 1744 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case RASOOL BUX vs The PROVINCE OF SINDH th

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Citation Name: 2025 CLC 1744 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case RASOOL BUX VS The PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Revenue Department, Karachi S. 115---Revisional jurisdiction of the High Court---Suo motu powers of High Court under revisional jurisdiction, exercise of---Concurrent findings of the courts below---Scope---To ensure that the subordinates Courts or quasi-judicial forums exercise jurisdiction vested in them in accordance with and within the bounds of law, the High Court has been bestowed with supervisory jurisdiction of superintendence---This supervisory role has its own significance in the dispensation of justice---Whenever it appears to the High Court that the subordinate courts have exercised a jurisdiction not vested in it by law, or have failed to exercise a jurisdiction so vested, or exercised jurisdiction illegally or with material irregularity, it can take cognizance of the matter in exercise of its revision jurisdiction under S. 115 read with S. 151 of C.P.C. in matters relating to civil disputes to rectify the illegalities or/and irregularities in the judgments and orders of the subordinate courts, to secure the ends of justice---If the concurrent findings recorded by the lower fora are found to be in violation of law, or based on misreading, non-reading of evidence, then they cannot be treated as being so sacrosanct or sanctified that cannot be reversed by the High Court in revisional jurisdiction, which is pre-emptively corrective and supervisory in nature---In fact, the Court in its revisional jurisdiction under S. 115 of C.P.C. can even exercise its suo moto powers to correct any jurisdictive errors committed by a subordinate Court to ensure strict adherence to the safe administration of justice---The jurisdiction vested in the High Court under S. 115 C.P.C is to satisfy and reassure that the order is within its jurisdiction---The scope of revisional jurisdiction is restricted to the extent of misreading, non-reading of evidence, jurisdictional error or an illegality in the judgment of the nature which may have a material effect on the result of the case, or if the conclusion drawn therein is perverse or conflicting to the law.

Citation Name: 2025 CLC 1744 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case RASOOL BUX vs The PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Revenue Department, Karachi S — 2025 CLC 1744 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLC