PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MUHAMMAD TARIQ vs MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM S — 2025 CLC 1775 BOARD-OF-REVENUE-PUNJAB

Case information

Citation
2025 CLC 1775 BOARD-OF-REVENUE-PUNJAB
Year
2025
Reporter
CLC
Parties
MUHAMMAD TARIQ vs MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM S
Provisions referred to
S. 135---P

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MUHAMMAD TARIQ VS MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM S. 135---Partition proceedings---Wandajat, constitution of---Specific objections to partition proceedings not pin-pointed---Appreciation of objections---Scope---Petitioners (co-sharers) assailed order passed by the Additional Commissioner (Revenue) whereby the concurrent findings of two Courts below were set-aside---Validity---The respondent was asked to specifically pin-point what his specific objection was on the partition proceedings but he failed---Merely claiming that objections were not appreciated by the Revenue Officer during partition proceedings was not a valid ground to remand the case unless it was proven to the Appellate or the Revisional Authorities that the objections were worthy of consideration and were tenable---Member Board of Revenue set aside impugned order passed by the Additional Commissioner (Revenue); consequently, orders passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue) and Tehsildar were maintained---Revision petition was accepted, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English