Citation Name: 2025 CLC 1818 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case HAFEEZULLAH ABDUL REHMAN vs PROVINCE O

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Citation Name: 2025 CLC 1818 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case HAFEEZULLAH ABDUL REHMAN VS PROVINCE OF SINDH through Principal Secretary Chief Minister Modification of---Scope---Appellant assailed an interim order which essentially had modified earlier ad-interim orders in previous civil suits passed by Trial Court (Single Bench of High Court) ('modified impugned order')---Case of the appellant was that there were some bunch of cases of like nature and earlier ad interim orders were being observed in two suits, however, when all said suits were clubbed together, the ad interim order in latest suit passed on CMA was modified---Claim being that it could not have been done unless the office had fixed the application on that day---Validity---Appellant may be right in understanding that the earlier ad interim orders passed in the referred suits and the one modified in one of those suits have overlapped each other but there is no dispute that these were only interim/ad-interim orders---Present appeal was only against a modified impugned order which was of interim nature, which might have overlapped the earlier one in another similar nature suit clubbed together---Appeals against ad-interim/interim orders are not to be entertained unless exceptional circumstances and serious injustice is shown---Grievances of appellant could be remedied once the application is heard and decided finally---The suit is ripe for hearing only when the issues are framed and not otherwise---In the present case, the consideration is totally different; it was only an ad-interim order which was modified and is still an interim order---If an ad-interim order could be granted after hearing a counsel, it can always be modified if the circumstances require so, subject to final conclusion to be drawn after hearing---Since it is only an interim order, the appellant / counsel may assist the Trial Court (Single Bench of High Court ) in reaching to a just and lawful conclusion and seek disposal of the pending application as required under the law---Appeal was disposed of accordingly.

Citation Name: 2025 CLC 1818 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case HAFEEZULLAH ABDUL REHMAN vs PROVINCE OF SINDH through Principal Secretary Chief Minister Modification of — 2025 CLC 1818 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Judgment text as reported

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLC