PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

GHULAM HASSAN vs IJAZ NASEER Ss — 2025 CLC 196 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2025 CLC 196 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
CLC
Parties
GHULAM HASSAN vs IJAZ NASEER Ss
Subject matter
Civil

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

GHULAM HASSAN VS IJAZ NASEER Ss. 21 & 22---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts. 102 & 103---Specific performance of agreement to sell, refusal of---Discretion---Documentary and oral evidence---Effect---Appellants / defendants were aggrieved of judgment and decree passed by Trial Court in favour of respondent / plaintiff---Validity---Neither in plaint nor in agreement between parties there was any reference of previous litigation or plea of execution of agreement after such litigation or settlement of issue nor was the property described with reference to any previous litigation---In absence of foundation in plaint of facts pertaining to previous litigation and also particulars of revenue record and that of Excise and Taxation Department, with reference to such previous litigation either in agreement or in plaint, any evidence produced by respondent / plaintiff for such fact was inadmissible---Such important aspects of the matter and deficiency in agreement were ignored by Trial Court which had serious reflection on the fate of the claim under adjudication---Plea of oral agreement as to alleged commercialization of property or commitment to allow adjustment of commercialization expenses from sale consideration was not part of agreement, therefore, was inadmissible---Respondent / plaintiff did not prove that he had funds to pay balance consideration as relevant statement of accounts were not produced and only account statement pertaining to earnest money was produced---Respondent / plaintiff did not even tender amount in Court nor ever attempted to deposit balance consideration till passing of decree---Respondent / plaintiff's intention was visible and he had not proved his readiness and willingness to perform the contract by paying balance consideration, therefore, relief of specific performance could not be granted---High Court dismissed suit filed by respondent / plaintiff and set aside judgment and decree passed by Trial Court---Appeal was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English