I.B. EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY vs ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE-II, EAST ISLAMABAD Ss — 2025 CLC 408 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation: 2025 CLC 408 ISLAMABAD
Court: Islamabad High Court
Year: 2025
Reporter: CLC
Parties: I.B. EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY vs ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE-II, EAST ISLAMABAD Ss
Subject matter: Civil
Provisions referred to: S. 25---I; S. 23---E; S. 59; Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964); Islamabad Rent Restriction Ordinance (IV of 2001); Co-operative Societies Act; Family Courts Act; Islamabad Rent Restriction Ordinance

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

I.B. EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY VS ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE-II, EAST ISLAMABAD Ss. 59(1)(a)---Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), S.25---Islamabad Rent Restriction Ordinance (IV of 2001), S.23---Execution of orders/decrees---Scope---Comparison of provisions of Co-operative Societies Act, 1925 ("CSA") with the provisions of Family Courts Act, 1964 and Islamabad Rent Restriction Ordinance, 2001---Significant distinction in phraseology of said laws---Examination of the provisions of the Family Courts Act, 1964 and the Islamabad Rent Restriction Ordinance, 2001 in comparison with S.59(1)(a) of the Co-operative Societies Act, 1925 ("CSA") highlighted various significant differences in phraseology---As per provision of the Co-operative Societies Act, 1925 it is an order passed inter alia by the Registrar under the stipulated provisions that shall be deemed to be a decree of the Civil Court and which shall be executed in the same manner as a decree of such court, therefore, the subject of the said provision is the order passed by the Registrar, which has been accorded the status of a decree passed by a Civil Court and as such ordains for it to be executed in the same manner as a decree of the Civil Court and the said provision does not state that the Registrar shall be deemed to be a Civil Court---Comparison with the other provisions of laws makes it clear and apparent that where the Legislature intended to confer the power of execution upon the forum passing the order/decree to be executed, it does so in clear and explicit language, which is conspicuously missing in S.59(1)(a) of the CSA.

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLC

2025 CLC 236 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANMUHAMMAD ALI VS SECRETARY BOARD OF REVENUE, GOVT. OF BALOCHISTAN. Ss. 39, 42 and 54 - Balochistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 - Suit for cancella…
2025 CLC 297 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANMUHAMMAD ALAM VS Malik ZAHOOR AHMED. Ss.42 & 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss. 24, 35a & 115---Suit for declaration and injunction-…
2025 CLC 276 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANALI AKBAR VS Mst. NASEEM. S. 5, Sched---Maintenance allowance of minors---Father, responsibility of---Scope---Definition of maintenance, whi…
2025 CLC 253 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANDAD MUHAMMAD VS NATIONAL DATABASE and REGISTRATION AUTHORITY through Director General NADRA Provincial Headquarter Zarghoon Road, Quetta. Ss…
2025 CLC 1852 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESHABANA PARVEEN VS Malik MOHSIN HASSAN RASHEED Ss. 2(l) & 24---Eviction application---Relationship of landlord and tenant, denial of---Order…
2025 CLC 1852 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESHABANA PARVEEN VS Malik MOHSIN HASSAN RASHEED Words "may" and "shall" used in a section of an Act or an Ordinance---Whether directory or ma…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English