MIR MUHAMMAD vs ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT KARACHI Ss — 2025 CLC 896 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation: 2025 CLC 896 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court: Sindh High Court
Year: 2025
Reporter: CLC
Parties: MIR MUHAMMAD vs ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT KARACHI Ss
Subject matter: Constitutional

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MIR MUHAMMAD VS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT KARACHI Ss.28a & 34---acquisition of land---Compensation--- Unpaid claim, verification of---Fraud---Fictious documents---Petitioners claimed recovery of alleged unpaid amount of compensation with interest, dating back to 15-9-1975 up to the present date, under the provisions of the Land acquisition act, 1894---Validity---Petitioners' claims were grounded on fraud and based on fictitious documents---Petitioners managed to prolong the proceedings for years, wasting the Court's valuable time---actions of petitioners were not only vexatious but also abuse of judicial process---One of the two petitioners deceitfully extracted a sum of Rs.3,743,181/- by misleading Court into granting orders in his favour---These were the cases where imposition of special costs were fully justified---assertion made by authorities that entire claims of both petitioners were fraudulent and based on forged documents was enough to dismiss the petitions---Fraudulent conduct of petitioners had disqualified them from receiving any favourable judgment---High Court directed the petitioners to deposit costs of Rs.2,000,000/- (Rupees Two Million) each---High Court directed one of the petitioners who had already received a sum of Rs.3,743,181/- as alleged compensation, to return/redeposit the amount---High Court further directed that in case any petitioner failed to deposit his respective amounts within the stipulated period, the office of High Court would immediately fix the matters in Court for further orders---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLC

2025 CLC 236 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANMUHAMMAD ALI VS SECRETARY BOARD OF REVENUE, GOVT. OF BALOCHISTAN. Ss. 39, 42 and 54 - Balochistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 - Suit for cancella…
2025 CLC 297 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANMUHAMMAD ALAM VS Malik ZAHOOR AHMED. Ss.42 & 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss. 24, 35a & 115---Suit for declaration and injunction-…
2025 CLC 276 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANALI AKBAR VS Mst. NASEEM. S. 5, Sched---Maintenance allowance of minors---Father, responsibility of---Scope---Definition of maintenance, whi…
2025 CLC 253 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTANDAD MUHAMMAD VS NATIONAL DATABASE and REGISTRATION AUTHORITY through Director General NADRA Provincial Headquarter Zarghoon Road, Quetta. Ss…
2025 CLC 1852 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESHABANA PARVEEN VS Malik MOHSIN HASSAN RASHEED Ss. 2(l) & 24---Eviction application---Relationship of landlord and tenant, denial of---Order…
2025 CLC 1852 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESHABANA PARVEEN VS Malik MOHSIN HASSAN RASHEED Words "may" and "shall" used in a section of an Act or an Ordinance---Whether directory or ma…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English