PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Haji ALI MUHAMMAD vs The SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, CONSTITUTION AVENUE, G-5/1, G-5 ISLAMABAD art — 2025 CLC 922 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2025 CLC 922 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
CLC
Parties
Haji ALI MUHAMMAD vs The SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, CONSTITUTION AVENUE, G-5/1, G-5 ISLAMABAD art
Subject matter
Constitutional

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Haji ALI MUHAMMAD VS The SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, CONSTITUTION AVENUE, G-5/1, G-5 ISLAMABAD art. 199---Balochistan Wildlife (Protection, Preservation, Conservation and Management) act (XIV of 2014), Preamble---Hunting (of houbara bustard bird) by the arab dignitaries---Community Game Reserves on private properties by their owners---Multiple grievances raised by such owners---Invoking constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court---Government established Community Game Reserves (Reserves) on private properties for hunting of houbara bustard bird by the arab dignitaries---Petitioner (Rakhshan Wildlife Conservancy Washuk) managed one such reserve and filed constitutional petition against activities/complaints relating to the hunting---Maintainability---Grievances of the petitioner were that not only the owners of the lands, tenants and people of the area were deprived from their land and grazing cattle, the free movement of the people was also curtailed and they were threatened of serious consequences by the staff of the arab dignitaries---Validity---Petitioners spread a wide rope without specifying areas, above all, their ownership or representation of the community---High Court cannot grant relief based on a vague and evasive factual controversy, nor can it be determined in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court---However, the petitioners may approach the proper forum to redress their grievances---Constitutional petition, being merit-less, was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLC

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English