PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MURTAZA TALPUR vs LEOPARDS COURIER SERVICES Ss — 2025 CLD 1141 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation
2025 CLD 1141 ISLAMABAD
Court
Islamabad High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
CLD
Parties
MURTAZA TALPUR vs LEOPARDS COURIER SERVICES Ss

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MURTAZA TALPUR VS LEOPARDS COURIER SERVICES Ss.8(1) & 9(3)---Jurisdiction of the Consumer Court---Vested jurisdiction must be exercised---Failure to exercise jurisdiction defeats the very purpose of granting jurisdiction---Multiplicity of proceedings to be avoided---Same cause of action should not lead to parallel litigation---Consumer Courts are designed for consolidated and swift redress of claims, not partial or piecemeal remedies---Refusal to exercise vested jurisdiction not only tends to defeat the purpose of conferring jurisdiction but also exposes litigants to unnecessary hardship, expenditure and multiplicity of proceedings---Requiring the consumer to seek special and general damages for the same cause of action from a different forum will only lead to multiplicity of proceedings.

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English