MULTI NATIONAL VENTURE DEVELOPMENT (PVT.) LIMITED vs DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY Ss — 2025 CLD 1871 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation: 2025 CLD 1871 ISLAMABAD
Court: Islamabad High Court
Year: 2025
Reporter: CLD
Parties: MULTI NATIONAL VENTURE DEVELOPMENT (PVT.) LIMITED vs DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY Ss
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 30; S. 17

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MULTI NATIONAL VENTURE DEVELOPMENT (PVT.) LIMITED VS DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY Ss.17, 20, 30 & 39---award---Misconduct of arbitrator---Particular question, non-deciding of---Both the parties assailed judgment passed by Trial Court, whereby award was made rule of the Court to the extent of questions finally determined by the arbitrator while for the question not decided, the matter was remanded by Trial Court to the arbitrator for decision afresh---Validity---arbitrator was unable to show his expertise regarding mathematical calculations, where he had shown his inability in a particular subject and the same could have been settled by calling an auditor or chartered accountant firm---Trial Court rightly held that such portion was separable and was to be remanded to the arbitrator who could give its findings but such aspect could not be called as misconduct in the true sense by arbitrator, rather he did not conclude the matter finally and left it to the Court---Trial Court had rightly remanded the matter to arbitrator as such there was no denial that the arbitrator had recorded reasons which had further been appreciated by Trial Court---Ground for setting aside the award in terms of S. 30 of arbitration act, 1940 were not demonstrated by parties to the extent of portion of remitting of award---High Court, under S. 17 of arbitration act, 1940 upheld the portion of award which was remitted back to arbitrator, as the same was in accordance with law---High Court directed that direction given by Trial Court should be complied with accordingly---appeal was dismissed in circumstances. Your Search returned total 35531 records from 8500 - 8550

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLD

2025 CLD 1438 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHIN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2017 VS BEACH LUXURY HOLDINGS (PRIVATE) LIMITED, SPENCER AND COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED AND PHYSONS (PRIV…
2025 CLD 53 INSURANCE-TRIBUNAL-LAHOREMUHAMMAD TARIQ VS JUBILEE LIFE INSURANCE S. 77---Language of policy documents---Principle---It is mandatory requirement of law to use plain…
2025 CLD 288 SECURITIES-AND-EXCHANGE-COMMISSION-OF-PAKISTANUNITED INSURANCE COMPANY OF PAKISTAN LIMITED VS The DIRECTOR/HOD, ADJUDICATION-I, ADJUDICATION DIVISION, SECP, ISLAMABAD Ss. 156 & 167---Tak…
2025 CLD 872 SECURITIES-AND-EXCHANGE-COMMISSION-OF-PAKISTANThe UNITED INSURANCE COMPANY OF PAKISTAN LIMITED VS The HOD, ADJUDICATION-I, ADJUDICATION DIVISION, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PA…
2025 CLD 435 SECURITIES-AND-EXCHANGE-COMMISSION-OF-PAKISTANHAJRA TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED VS DIRECTOR, CORPORATE SUPERVISION DEPARTMENT, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN S. 33(1)(a)---Comp…
2025 CLD 393 SECURITIES-AND-EXCHANGE-COMMISSION-OF-PAKISTANUBL FUND MANAGEMENT LIMITED VS Ms. MOMY KAMAL Reglns. 66a(c)(i), 66a(c)(iv), 66a(d) & 66a(f)---Investing in Equity/Mutual Funds---Mis-sellin…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English