SALMAN CAPITAL INVESTMENTS (PVT.) LIMITED vs MCB BANK LIMITED Ss — 2025 CLD 641 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation: 2025 CLD 641 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court: Sindh High Court
Year: 2025
Reporter: CLD
Parties: SALMAN CAPITAL INVESTMENTS (PVT.) LIMITED vs MCB BANK LIMITED Ss
Subject matter: Civil

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

SALMAN CAPITAL INVESTMENTS (PVT.) LIMITED VS MCB BANK LIMITED Ss. 22 & 24---Judgment passed by the Banking Court---Appeal, filing of---Limitation---Condonation of delay---Sufficient cause---Appellant (customer / Company), instead of filing within thirty days, filed appeal with a delay of atleast 08 months after passing of decree---Validity---Along with the application for condonation of delay, a photostat copy of a certificate, purportedly issued by a doctor had been filed by the deponent to support his statement / explanation ('certificate-in-question')---Certificate-in-question was issued on such date when at least seven months of impugned judgment has already elapsed---Certificate-in-question depicted that the deponent had remained under the treatment of said doctor for severe post trauma stress disorder ; however, it did not show that for how much period deponent remained under the treatment of the said doctor and from when---The doctor, in the certificate-in-question, had not clarified whether the deponent was not even able to communicate simple instructions to his lawyer to file an appeal within time, or that he was so incapacitated that his routine life had been compromised so much so that he had lost his ability to perform daily chores or run routine errands like a normal person---Therefore, certificate-in-question was of little help to the appellant for covering delay in filing the appeal---Consequently, the application for condonation of delay was also dismissed---Appeal, filed by customer / company was also dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 CLD

2025 CLD 1438 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHIN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2017 VS BEACH LUXURY HOLDINGS (PRIVATE) LIMITED, SPENCER AND COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED AND PHYSONS (PRIV…
2025 CLD 53 INSURANCE-TRIBUNAL-LAHOREMUHAMMAD TARIQ VS JUBILEE LIFE INSURANCE S. 77---Language of policy documents---Principle---It is mandatory requirement of law to use plain…
2025 CLD 288 SECURITIES-AND-EXCHANGE-COMMISSION-OF-PAKISTANUNITED INSURANCE COMPANY OF PAKISTAN LIMITED VS The DIRECTOR/HOD, ADJUDICATION-I, ADJUDICATION DIVISION, SECP, ISLAMABAD Ss. 156 & 167---Tak…
2025 CLD 872 SECURITIES-AND-EXCHANGE-COMMISSION-OF-PAKISTANThe UNITED INSURANCE COMPANY OF PAKISTAN LIMITED VS The HOD, ADJUDICATION-I, ADJUDICATION DIVISION, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PA…
2025 CLD 435 SECURITIES-AND-EXCHANGE-COMMISSION-OF-PAKISTANHAJRA TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED VS DIRECTOR, CORPORATE SUPERVISION DEPARTMENT, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN S. 33(1)(a)---Comp…
2025 CLD 393 SECURITIES-AND-EXCHANGE-COMMISSION-OF-PAKISTANUBL FUND MANAGEMENT LIMITED VS Ms. MOMY KAMAL Reglns. 66a(c)(i), 66a(c)(iv), 66a(d) & 66a(f)---Investing in Equity/Mutual Funds---Mis-sellin…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English