Citation Name: 2025 MLD 1508 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Bakhtiar Ali Domki vs State Ss — 2025 MLD 1508 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation: 2025 MLD 1508 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court: Sindh High Court
Year: 2025
Reporter: MLD
Parties: Citation Name: 2025 MLD 1508 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Bakhtiar Ali Domki vs State Ss
Subject matter: Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2025 MLD 1508 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Bakhtiar Ali Domki VS State Ss. 302, 114 & 34---Sindh arms act (V of 2013), Ss. 23(i)(a) & 25---Qatl-i-amd, abettor present when offence committed, common intention, possession of illicit weapon---appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Delay of 27 hours in lodging the FIR---Consequential---accused was charged for committing murder of the brother of complainant by firing---Complainant as per prosecution story had deposed in the Court that incident occurred in his presence and he identified the perpetrators of the crime as appellant and co-accused who came there at about 12:00 Noon on 08.05.2021 and fired upon deceased with pistol upon the instigation of co-accused---Injured was taken to hospital but succumbed to injuries in the way---Complainant informed the police about the incident promptly and police party from Police Station concerned reached the hospital, inspected dead body, inspected place of incident and after post mortem handed over the dead body to the complainant---Matter of record that complainant and witnesses remained with the police party for about more than three hours but they did not record the facts of incidents to the police and turned up to record FIR on next day viz. 09.05.2021---First Investigating Officer deposed that he asked the complainant to record FIR but he refused and said that he would lodge the FIR later on after consultation---First Information Report of the incident was recorded on 09.05.2021 at about 03.00 pm with a delay of about 27 hours, which remained unexplained---Circumstances established that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the appellant beyond shadow of reasonable doubt---appeal against conviction was allowed, accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2025 MLD

2025 MLD 1208 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHCitation Name: 2025 MLD 1208 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Anwer Majid VS Emirates Bank International PJSC (formerly Union Bank…
2025 MLD 1426 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHCitation Name: 2025 MLD 1426 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Muhammad Sharif VS State Ss. 504, 506-B, 148, 149, 337-a(i) & 337-F(…
2025 MLD 1973 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREFahim Ahmed Saeed VS Mian Humayun Mahmud O.XXXIX, Rr.1, 2, O.XLIII, R.1(r) --- appeal against order of Trial Court refusing to grant ad-inte…
2025 MLD 1879 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESumera Rasheed VS State S. 191---Perjury (false evidence)---Administration of justice---Duty of Courts---Perjury is a vice which stigmatizes…
2025 MLD 1879 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESumera Rasheed VS State S. 191---False evidence---Necessary ingredients---Section 191, P.P.C talks about making of false statement in follow…
2025 MLD 1879 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORESumera Rasheed VS State S. 192---Fabricating false evidence---Necessary ingredients---Requirement of S.192 P.P.C. is met only if there is an…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English