PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2025 MLD 1508 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Bakhtiar Ali Domki vs State Ss — 2025 MLD 1508 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2025 MLD 1508 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
MLD
Parties
Citation Name: 2025 MLD 1508 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Bakhtiar Ali Domki vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2025 MLD 1508 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Bakhtiar Ali Domki VS State Ss. 302, 114 & 34---Sindh arms act (V of 2013), Ss. 23(i)(a) & 25---Qatl-i-amd, abettor present when offence committed, common intention, possession of illicit weapon---appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Preparation of memos---Inconsistencies---accused was charged for committing murder of the brother of complainant by firing---Investigating Officer, who conducted the initial investigation, prepared inquest report in hospital, prepared memo of inspection of injuries, secured last worn clothes of deceased, handed over the dead body to complainant, visited place of incident and prepared inspection memo on the very day in the company of complainant and witness through a Roznamcha Entry 9-a which he produced before Trial Court while recording his evidence to establish that he departed from the police station soon after the incident---Page number 02 of Roznamcha/entry book produced by this witness evidenced all entries in the book on the relevant day started from entry No 4 to 9, there was no other entry having a, B except that entry, which created doubt on the movement of said witness from police station and recording of the memos in presence and company of complainant party, it appeared that all the memos were managed at police station---Second Investigating Officer denied of existence of such entry in police record---Said witness deposed that at police station roznamcha entries were recorded in acceding order of 1,2,3 and not by 1a, 1B---Said witness deposed that there was no any entry 9-a available in police station or shown to him by first Investigating Officer---Such piece of evidence rendered by second Investigating Officer belied the movement and departure of first Investigating Officer from Police Station to the place of incident and hospital---Circumstances established that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the appellant beyond shadow of reasonable doubt---appeal against conviction was allowed, accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2025 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English