PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Muhammad Jan vs Barat alias Rado S — 2025 MLD 331 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2025 MLD 331 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
MLD
Parties
Muhammad Jan vs Barat alias Rado S
Subject matter
Civil
Provisions referred to
S. 115

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Muhammad Jan VS Barat alias Rado S. 115 & O.VI, R.2---Suit for recovery of money---admission in written statement---Effect--- Suit filed by respondent / plaintiff was dismissed by Trial Court but Lower appellate Court decreed the same---Validity---In written statement, petitioner / defendant must raise through his pleading all matters---Party was bound by its admission in written statement which could be used as evidence of conclusive nature---Witnesses of petitioner / defendant stated that he had made payments but none of the witnesses stated date, time and year of payment, therefore, burden was not discharged on basis of such type of vague statement---Revisional jurisdiction of High Court was limited and merits of case could not be reopened---High Court in exercise of revisional jurisdiction was to confine itself to law point only or misreading or non-reading of evidence--- Revision was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 MLD

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English