PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

MIr Ahmed Khan vs State S — 2025 PCrLJ 1102 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2025 PCrLJ 1102 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
MIr Ahmed Khan vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 489-F---D

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

MIr Ahmed Khan VS State S. 489-F---Dishonestly issuing a cheque---Appreciation of evidence---Contradictions and improvements in the statement of complainant---Accused was charged for issuing a cheque in favour of complainant, which was dishonoured when presented before the concerned bank---Complainant, during cross-examination changed his version with respect to the purchase of the house by the accused from him and he stated that he sold out three vehicles to the accused and the accused gave some amount to him and in respect of the other outstanding amount he gave a cheque to him---Complainant also made dishonest improvement in his statement when for the first time he introduced allegation of purchasing of the vehicle by the accused from him---Change in the version of the complainant was not an outcome of frail human memory, rather was deliberately made with a nefarious design of bringing his testimony in conformity with the alleged cheque issued by the accused in his favour, thus, it in no manner could be brushed aside---Moreover, it was the purity of a testimony which led a Court to pronounce a guilty verdict and if such purity was polluted through dishonest improvements, the eye-witness lost his credibility rendering his evidence not worthy of any credence---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English