PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Muhammad Ayaz Khan vs Ms — 2025 PCrLJ 1109 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation
2025 PCrLJ 1109 ISLAMABAD
Court
Islamabad High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Muhammad Ayaz Khan vs Ms
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 204; S. 403; S. 249; S. 417

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Muhammad Ayaz Khan VS Ms. Iman Haider Syed Ss. 200 & 417(2)---appeal against acquittal, filing of---Private complaint dismissed in default---appeal against acquittal in a case instituted upon a (private) complaint---Scope---Private complaint was filed, but the cursory statement of the complainant had not yet been recorded due to his non-availability and complaint was dismissed due to non-appearance of the complainant and for non-compliance with the persistent orders of the Court---Validity---Complaint was dismissed at the initial stage; it had not yet been processed under S.204, Cr.P.C, and no notice or summons had been issued to the accused---When the summons is issued and the case is fixed for the attendance of the accused, the Court can dismiss the case for non-prosecution due to the non-appearance of the complainant and consequently acquit the accused---In the present case, no process was issued to the accused for attendance---Trial of an accused commenced when the accused was summoned and charge was framed against him---Case of the appellant/complainant did not fall under S. 403, Cr.P.C, as neither the accused was summoned, nor the charge was framed against the accused, resultantly he was neither acquitted nor convicted---Furthermore, in the Explanation of S.403, Cr.P.C it was mentioned that the dismissal of a complaint and stopping of proceedings under S.249, Cr.P.C [or the discharge of the accused] was not acquittal for the purposes of this Section---Dismissal of the complaint did not amount to acquittal of the accused, therefore, S.403, Cr.P.C would not be applicable in the present case---In the present case, since the proceeding were at a preliminary stage and the complaint was dismissed under S.403, Cr.P.C, that did not constitute an acquittal of the accused---Therefore, an appeal under S.417(2-a), Cr.P.C, could not be filed---appeal being not maintainable was dismissed.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English