PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Nasrullah alias Nasru vs State S — 2025 PCrLJ 1839 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE

Case information

Citation
2025 PCrLJ 1839 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE
Court
Lahore High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Nasrullah alias Nasru vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 497---P; S. 161; Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Nasrullah alias Nasru VS State S. 497---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 324, 337 F(iii) & 34---Attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, common intention---Post-arrest bail, refusal of---Sufficient incriminating material, availability of---Abscondance---Scope---Allegation against the petitioner/ accused was that he fired two successive shots with his rifle .44-bore at brother of the complainant(injured/victim), with intention to kill him; one fire shot which hit the right thigh of injured/victim, went through and through and second fire shot, which hit on his left thigh also went through and through---Validity---Record revealed that allegation levelled against the petitioner had been supported by the Medico Legal Examination Certificate (MLC) of the injured/victimwhile he (victim ) had also supported said allegation against the petitioner through his statement recorded under S.161 Cr.P.C. and after thorough investigation, said allegation leveled against the petitioner had been established---Petitioner, after the occurrence as well as registration of the case, became fugitive from law and he was declared as proclaimed offender---Weapon of recovery (rifle .44-bore) was recovered from the petitioner during investigation of the case and two empty shells of rifle .44-bore were also found from the place of occurrence at the time of spot inspection and said empty shells were found as having been fired from said rifle as per report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency---Thus, reasonable grounds were available to connect the petitioner with the commission of alleged offence and in such circumstances, abscondence of the petitioner also went against him---Petitioner had failed to make out case for grant of post-arrest bail---Bail was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English