PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Haneef Ahmed vs State S — 2025 PCrLJ 1890 ISLAMABAD

Case information

Citation
2025 PCrLJ 1890 ISLAMABAD
Court
Islamabad High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Haneef Ahmed vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 9; S. 103; S. 25; S. 342

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Haneef Ahmed VS State S. 9(1), Sr. No. (6)(c) & 25---Possession of narcotic substances---Appreciation of evidence---Police witnesses, evidence of---Scope---Prosecution case was that 1025 grams heroin powder was recovered from the possession of accused-appellant---Police Officials were as good as private witnesses as the provision of S.103, Cr.P.C., was not applicable to cases under CNSA, 1997, by virtue of S.25 thereof and their testimony could not be discarded merely for the reason that they were Police Officials unless accused persons prove their mala fide or ill-will towards the accused---Appellant in the instant case had not even alleged any enmity of the Police Officials against him let alone prove it---In his statement under S. 342 Cr.P.C accused stated that the reason for the registration of the case and deposition of the witnesses against him was to show their efficiency to the highups---However, the appellant failed to show any pressure on the police or any other cause to show that they were under any compulsion to show such efficiency that too by false implication against someone with whom they had no enmity---Appeal against conviction was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English