PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Muhammad Irfan vs State S — 2025 PCrLJ 1934 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2025 PCrLJ 1934 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Muhammad Irfan vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 380---T

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Muhammad Irfan VS State S. 380---Theft in a dwelling house, tent, or vessel---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Defective investigation---Accused was charged for taking away the mobile of complainant from his shop---Investigating Officer of the case admitted in his cross-examination that he transmitted the USB for Forensic Science Laboratory, but the analysis report whereof had not been received yet---Investigating Officer also admitted that the place of occurrence was thickly populated area, but he did not associate any independent witness in the recovery proceedings---Furthermore, Investigating Officer admitted that the parcel of recovered mobile phone was prepared in the Police Station---Investigating Officer also admitted that he did not record the statement of operator, who traced out the stolen mobile---Even otherwise, the Investigating Officer had not taken into possession the DVR of the CCTV Camera---Prima facie, the Investigating Officer of the case had failed to conduct a proper investigation to strengthen the case of prosecution---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English