PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2025 PCrLJ 369 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Mehrab BangUlani vs State Ss — 2025 PCrLJ 369 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2025 PCrLJ 369 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Citation Name: 2025 PCrLJ 369 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Mehrab BangUlani vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2025 PCrLJ 369 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Mehrab BangUlani VS State Ss. 302(b), 311, 120-B & 34---Qatl-i-amd, ta'azir after waiver or compounding of right of qisas in qatl-i-amd, criminal conspiracy, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Motive not proved---Accused was charged that he along with his co-accused person committed murder of the deceased lady by firing on the allegation of kari---Prosecution's allegation that the deceased was involved in an illicit relationship with one "AG", who was designated as "KARO"---According to the prosecution's narrative, the appellant was accused of murdering his sister and injuring "AG" at the time of the incident---However, during the proceedings before the Trial Court, "AG" did not support the prosecution's case---Instead, "AG" stated that he sustained his injuries at the hands of other culprits, thus distancing himself from the narrative presented by the prosecution---Said witness also reported the incident to the concerned police station, further complicating the prosecution's claims---Said testimony from "AG"was critical as it challenged the prosecution's assertion that the appellant acted out of jealousy or anger related to deceased's alleged relationship with him---By failing to corroborate the prosecution's allegations, "AG's evidence raised doubts about the motive attributed to the appellant and questioned the overall credibility of the prosecution's case---Divergence in testimonies further underscored the complexities of the case, as it highlighted inconsistencies in the prosecution's theory of the crime---Failure of key witnesses to support the prosecution's claims significantly weakened their position and put a heavy dent on the prosecution's case---Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English