PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2025 PCrLJ 577 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Muhammad Yasir vs State Ss — 2025 PCrLJ 577 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2025 PCrLJ 577 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Citation Name: 2025 PCrLJ 577 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Muhammad Yasir vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 154

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2025 PCrLJ 577 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Muhammad Yasir VS State Ss. 302(b), 324, 109 & 34---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, abetment, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Lodging of FIR with promptitude---Accused was charged for committing murder of the wife of complainant by firing and also causing fire arm injuries to his brother---Record showed that the FIR was lodged after six hours of the incident however based on the particular facts and circumstances of the case, it was found that the delay in lodging the FIR had been explained and was not fatal to the prosecution case---Complainant received a phone call about the incident who then rushed to the scene of occurrence where he found that the Mohalla people had taken his wife (deceased) to the hospital and thus he then went straight to the hospital where he recorded his S.154 Cr.P.C statement before the police which was the basis of the FIR---As such there was no time for the complainant to cook up a false case against the appellant---Appellant was named in the promptly lodged FIR with the specific role of murdering the deceased by firearm and causing firearm injury to injured---Even otherwise no specific/proven enmity had come on record between the appellant and the complainant or any witness which would motivate him/them to lodge a false case or give false evidence against the appellant---Circumstances established that the prosecution had proved its case against the appellant beyond a reasonable doubt---Appeal against conviction was dismissed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English