PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Muhammad Naeem vs State S — 2025 PCrLJ 732 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2025 PCrLJ 732 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Muhammad Naeem vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 9

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Muhammad Naeem VS State S. 9(c)---Possession of charas---Appreciation of evidence---Recovery of the narcotic proved---Prosecution case was that 2000-grams charas was recovered from the possession of applicant---Record showed that the prosecution examined complainant/Seizing Officer, marginal witness of recovery, in whose presence the alleged charas was recovered from a plastic bag held by the accused, Head Constable/Head Moharar of the police station, who received parcels of case property and kept the same in Malkhana of the police station after registering the same in Register No. 19, Head Constable, who deposited the sealed parcel to Forensic Science Laboratory and obtained report, and the Investigating Officer---All the said witnesses were consistent on all material aspects---No distinct discrepancy was noticed to spoil the credibility of their testimony and they were subjected to cross-examination by the defence but their testimony was not shattered---From the evidence, the mode and manner of arrest of applicant leading to the recovery of narcotic had been proved---Prosecution evidence was unanimous with regard to the arrest of the accused, place of the occurrence, quantity of the recovered charas, and to that extent, the evidence of the prosecution was also confidence inspiring---Appeal against conviction was dismissed, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English