PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Citation Name: 2025 PCrLJ 786 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Imtiaz Ali vs State Ss — 2025 PCrLJ 786 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation
2025 PCrLJ 786 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court
Sindh High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Citation Name: 2025 PCrLJ 786 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Imtiaz Ali vs State Ss
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 381-A---Q; S. 110; Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2025 PCrLJ 786 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Imtiaz Ali VS State Ss. 497 & 110---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.381-A---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts.38, 39 & 40---Theft of car and other motor vehicles----Post arrest bail, grant of---Extra-judicial confession made before the police---Admissibility---Registration of other FIRs---Expressions "habit" and "habitually"---Scope---Extra-judicial confession of the accused was recorded in police custody, thus, was not admissible under Arts.38 & 39 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984---Before conviction every accused is presumed to be innocent---Prosecution failed to establish that the petitioners were ever convicted in any case registered against them, therefore, they could not be refused bail merely on such ground---Bald allegations that a person by habit or habitually commits the offences highlighted in S.110 Cr.P.C. are not sufficient to proceed under that provision, rather the allegations must substantially be supported by cogent evidence---Such powers could not be exercised as a tool of oppression against innocent, poor and helpless people---Petitioners were admitted to post-arrest but, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English