Citation Name: 2025 PCrLJ 786 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Imtiaz Ali vs State Ss — 2025 PCrLJ 786 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH

Case information

Citation: 2025 PCrLJ 786 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH
Court: Sindh High Court
Year: 2025
Reporter: PCRLJ
Parties: Citation Name: 2025 PCrLJ 786 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Imtiaz Ali vs State Ss
Subject matter: Criminal
Provisions referred to: S. 381-A---Q; S. 497; Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Citation Name: 2025 PCrLJ 786 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHBookmark this Case Imtiaz Ali VS State Ss. 497, 75 & 87---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S.381-A---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts.38, 39 & 40---Theft of car and other motor vehicles----Post arrest bail, grant of---Extra-judicial confession made before the police---Admissibility---Further inquiry---Neither the petitioners were nominated in the FIR, nor warrants had been issued against them under Ss.75/87, Cr. P.C. that they had been arrested upon their statements in police custody; even after their arrest in the above cases, they were not forwarded to the Magistrate for their confessional statement to the effect that they were the persons who committed theft of the subject vehicles from the place of the incident as reported by both the complainant for the reason that confession before the police was not admissible in evidence under the law---Recovery of the stolen vehicles had been effected on the pointation of the petitioners and its evidentiary value was yet to be determined by the Trial Court after recording evidence as the prosecution claimed that there was CCTV footage---Wider net was thrown by the police to involve the petitioners on the pretext that they were professional car snatchers---Case of the petitioners did not fall within the prohibitory clause of S.497, Cr.P.C.---Grant of bail in such offences not falling within the prohibitory clause was a rule and refusal thereof was an except---Petitioners were admitted to post-arrest bail, in circumstances.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PCRLJ

2025 PCrLJ 286 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREMuhammad Dilshad VS State Medical evidence---Scope---Medical evidence is a type of supporting evidence, which may confirm the prosecution ve…
2025 PCrLJ 1791 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREShiraz Ahmad VS State Ss. 295-A, 295-B & 295-C---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), Ss. 11, 29, 44 (1) & 51---Criminal Proced…
2025 PCrLJ 1318 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREMuneeb Riaz VS State S. 497---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), Ss. 20, 21 & 24--- Harassing and blackmailing a woman, shari…
2025 PCrLJ 1310 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHOREShiraz Ahmad VS State Ss. 353 & 439---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.295-A, 295-B & 298-C---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016),…
2025 PCrLJ 526 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHSamiullah VS State S. 497(2)---prevention of electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), Ss. 9, 10 & 11---Penal Code ( XLV of 1860 ), Ss. 295-A, 295…
2025 PCrLJ 526 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDHSamiullah VS State Ss. 497 & 156---prevention of electronic Crimes Act ( XL of 2016 ), Ss. 9, 10 & 11---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 295-A,…

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English