PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Naimatullah vs State S — 2025 PCrLJ 963 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2025 PCrLJ 963 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Naimatullah vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 302

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Naimatullah VS State S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Motive proved---Accused was charged for committing murder of the nephew of the complainant by firing---Money dispute was the motive of the occurrence---In order to prove the motive, the prosecution produced father of the deceased as a witness, who testified that before the murder of his son, accused called his son through a phone call and threatened him of dire consequences---Said witness was cross- examined at length, but no favourable reply could be extracted by the defence in order to exonerate the accused from the indictment---Prosecution also produced recovery witness of a cheque, which had been dishonored by the bank, and it was secured vide recovery memo---Said witness produced copy of cheque and dishonor slip and its original copies---Manager of Bank testified that accused was account holder of his bank, and a cheque was returned due to insufficient balance---Statements of both the said witnesses had been scanned, which rang true as both of them had no reason to falsely implicate the accused---Motive alleged by prosecution witnesses seemed to have been successfully proved---Appeal against conviction was dismissed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English