PAK LAW GPT — Pakistan Case Law AI justice scale emblemPAK LAW GPTCase law · Urdu & English

Naimatullah vs State S — 2025 PCrLJ 963 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN

Case information

Citation
2025 PCrLJ 963 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN
Court
Balochistan High Court
Year
2025
Reporter
PCRLJ
Parties
Naimatullah vs State S
Subject matter
Criminal
Provisions referred to
S. 302

Fields are extracted from the reported citation and judgment text. Where a detail is not stated in the record, it is not shown.

Judgment text as reported

Naimatullah VS State S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Ocular account supported by medical evidence---Accused was charged for committing murder of the nephew of the complainant by firing---Complainant the sole eye-witness of the occurrence was maternal uncle of deceased, who accompanied him to the crime scene---According to complainant, accused alighted from a jeep, who was joined by his nephew, when suddenly they exchanged some hot words, whereupon the accused made firing with his pistol upon his nephew, which pierced his chest and he succumbed on the spot---Complainant was cross-examined at length by the defence, with regard to timing of arrival, Iftari, blood of deceased on his hands and clothes, taking the deceased to hospital and other aspects of the matter, but the defence could not shake his testimony---Complainant remained firm and consistent to his examination-in-chief, revealing the ocular account of the incident---Presence of complainant was denied on the crime scene by the defence, but it did not succeed in shaking his testimony---Deposition of complainant had been found to be natural and confidence inspiring, which went unshaken---Complainant was related to the deceased, but mere relation did not disqualify his testimony---Testimony of complainant had also been confirmed by the medical account furnished by Medical Officer, who testified that the dead body of deceased was brought by SI (police) and identified by complainant with history of firearm, whereof he issued Medico Legal Certificate---Defence had not disputed the unnatural death of the deceased---Forensic Science Laboratory Report had further cemented the unnatural death of the deceased by firearm, thus it could be concluded with no other view that the medical evidence confirmed the ocular account of complainant---Appeal against conviction was dismissed accordingly.

Other judgments reported in 2025 PCRLJ

Back to the case-law library · Search Pakistani case law in Urdu or English